Hanson v Wilke and Company Pty Ltd - video
Hanson v Wilke and Company Pty Ltd (NSWPICPD 2024)
Click below to watch a summary of the case and why Richard chose to write about it:
Hanson v Wilke and Company Pty Ltd (NSWPICPD 2024)
Click below to watch a summary of the case and why Richard chose to write about it:
Recent Decisions
Employer negligence for psychological injury – foreseeability of risk and duty of care
Karzi v Toll Pty Ltd (NSWCA 2024)
Negligence: the critical step of proving causation
Gomez v Woolworths Group Limited (NSWCA 2024)
Gomez v Woolworths Group Limited (NSWCA 2024)
Key Takeaways
The Court of Appeal has confirmed the well-established principle that in order to be successful in a claim for negligence, a plaintiff must prove:
GPO Box 2554,
Sydney NSW 2001
Level 44,
2 Park Street,
Sydney NSW 2000
Gomez v Woolworths Group Limited (NSWCA 2024)
Click below to watch a summary of the case and why Eliza decided to write about it.
To read the full article, please click here,
GPO Box 2554,
Sydney NSW 2001
Level 44,
2 Park Street,
Sydney NSW 2000
Karzi v Toll Pty Ltd (NSWCA 2024)
Click below to watch a summary of the case and why Brad decided to write about it.
The new unfair contract laws started on 9 November 2023.
Businesses have invested heavily in ensuring that their standard contract forms comply with the new laws. The success of that investment will largely turn on how the Courts will interpret and apply these new laws.
A recent decision of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal) has confirmed regulators may obtain a release from their implied undertaking in order to exercise other regulatory functions in the public interest.
Key Takeaways
The implied undertaking prescribes that a party to proceedings cannot, without leave, use documents obtained in that proceeding for another purpose or in another proceeding.